Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
Eppendorf

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 6 October 2006:
Vol. 314. no. 5796, pp. 70 - 71
DOI: 10.1126/science.1133500

Perspectives

ASTRONOMY:
Galactic Prominences on the Rise

Mark Morris*

The central region of our Galaxy contains a massive concentration of interstellar molecular gas that has been surveyed many times. The most often used probe of this gas is emission from the most abundant molecule that can easily be observed, carbon monoxide. On page 106 of this issue, Fukui et al. (1) extend earlier surveys of CO to a substantially larger region than had previously been mapped. The initial results reveal surprising new structures: giant molecular loops located a few thousand light-years from the galactic center and extending almost a thousand light-years above the galactic plane (2).

Interstellar gas in our Galaxy--or in any equilibrated and undisturbed spiral galaxy--resides in a relatively thin rotating disk. It is confined to this disk by the gravitational force of the stars, which are at their densest in the central plane of the galactic disk. The thickness of the gas disk is determined by the degree to which it has been stirred by supernovae and galactic shocks (both of which generate large-scale turbulence) and by the Galaxy's magnetic field, which prevents the gas from collapsing into a much thinner layer. The magnetic field in the disk of the Galaxy is predominantly parallel to the disk, supporting the gas against the largely "vertical" gravitational field (here, "vertical" means perpendicular to the disk).

In 1966, however, Parker (3) pointed out that this configuration is not stable: Any vertical indentation in the magnetic field on a sufficiently large scale will provide a "pool" into which interstellar gas will sink as it slides down the tipped field lines in response to gravity (see the figure). As gas is unloaded from the higher lying sections of the field lines, the field becomes increasingly buoyant and thus rises there (4). At the same time, as the pooled section gathers mass, it will sink toward the galactic midplane, deforming the field more, accelerating the flow of gas into it. As the resulting gas concentrations become denser, the gas cools relatively quickly, creating dense molecular clouds or cloud complexes via the Jeans instability (5). Because star formation in our Galaxy takes place primarily in molecular clouds, this combined Parker-Jeans instability might play an important role in fostering much of the star formation.

Figure 1 Loop formation. Successive stages of the Parker instability occurring above the galactic plane. (Left) An idealized set of magnetic field lines oriented parallel to the midplane of a disk-shaped galaxy. The real galactic magnetic field is subject to considerable distortion about the mean field shown. (Middle) Any vertical perturbation to the field lines begins the instability and causes gas to slide down the tilted field lines. (Right) As the instability develops, large magnetic loops form above the galactic plane, and the gas concentrated at the base of the magnetic loops may form molecular clouds. Unless the tops of the loops are weighed down by dense gas, they will keep expanding into the halo of the galaxy.
The Parker instability is well established among theorists and operates in the Sun, playing a role in the generation of arches, loops, and prominences, and possibly in the production of sunspots. Yet it has not been definitively observed to be operating on galactic scales for want of a good diagnostic (6). Fukui and his collaborators argue that the giant molecular loops they observe have resulted from the Parker instability. The radial velocity field that they infer from the Doppler shifts of the CO emission indicates that these are indeed loops, rather than shells, and that there is a flow of material along the loops, as is anticipated by the theory (7). Also, the size of the galactic loops is in the range expected for the Parker instability. This is an exciting development, raising the possibility of directly confirming this phenomenon on a galactic scale--a scale larger by 12 orders of magnitude than the magnetic loops seen on the Sun.

Two challenges are presented by this interpretation, however, both of which might be met with more observational work. The first is that there is so far no evidence of a magnetic field in the loops, which could be resolved by measurement of polarized emission caused by magnetic alignment of dust grains (8). The galactic center is indeed known to have a strong magnetic field (9), although it has not yet been measured as far out as the loops are located. Furthermore, the field within 300 or 400 light-years of the galactic center is vertical, which would not support the Parker instability. Thus, the presence of the molecular loops farther out--if indeed they result from a Parker mechanism--necessitates that the field orientation shift to the horizontal configuration characteristic of the rest of the galactic disk somewhere between 400 and 1000 light-years from the center. Also, if the strength of the galactic magnetic field at the loops remains high relative to the field farther out in the disk, then we can perhaps understand why this is the place where they were discovered: Stronger magnetic loops are more buoyant.

The other challenge is to explain why magnetic loops resulting from the Parker instability are outlined by molecular gas. Descriptions of the Parker instability have assumed only a diffuse, low-density atomic gas, because that is what is typically present in the interstellar medium far above the galactic plane where the instability manifests itself. Molecular clouds had previously been thought to form by the Parker-Jeans instability only at the "footpoints" of the loops, where they join the gas layer in the galactic plane. Molecular gas may have been levitated from near the galactic gas layer by the buoyancy of the magnetic field, but if the gas is flowing down the sides of the loop along the magnetic field lines, why is there so much gas left high above the galactic plane? One possible answer to this question is that the rising portion of the magnetic loop has shocked and compressed the relatively rarified atomic gas in front of it, leading to rapid cooling and ultimately to a phase transition from atomic to molecular gas. If so, then the molecular gas defining the loops is constantly being replenished.

Deformation of the horizontal magnetic field by the Parker instability generates vertical magnetic field components out of a horizontal field; thus, it is interesting to contemplate how the newly discovered loops might relate to the strong vertical field closer to the galactic center. The magnetic field in the two vertical legs (or "flux tubes") of a rising loop should persist with opposite polarity (i.e., opposite field direction), even after the top of the loop has completely broken out of the galactic gas layer and expanded into the galactic halo. If those magnetic legs are then transported toward the center of the Galaxy by the inexorable inward migration of their footpoints (10), then all the vertical magnetic flux tubes produced by this process will pile up there. As they are brought into contact, the flux tubes of opposite polarity can interact with each other, through a process called field line reconnection, and deposit energy along their boundary. This provides a possible explanation for another phenomenon that radio astronomers have studied for more than 20 years: a population of vertical, radio-emitting, magnetized filaments in the inner few hundred light-years of the Galaxy (11). Because it is these filaments that initially led me and other astronomers to conclude that there exists a vertical magnetic field at the galactic center, it seems worthwhile to now reconsider the whole picture from a broader perspective. The loops reported by Fukui et al. may well give us a handle on this complex process.

References and Notes

  1. Y. Fukui et al., Science 314, 106 (2006).
  2. For comparison, our distance from the galactic center is ~25,000 light-years.
  3. E. N. Parker, Astrophys. J. 145, 811 (1966). [CrossRef]
  4. The buoyancy of the magnetic loop is augmented by the pressure of the "gas" of galactic cosmic rays. These essentially light-speed particles inflate the region encompassed by the loop.
  5. B. G. Elmegreen, Astrophys. J. 253, 634 (1982). [CrossRef]
  6. Some relatively nearby magnetic structures lying well above the galactic plane have been interpreted as manifestations of the Parker instability, but these are more readily explained as compressed, magnetized shells lying at the surfaces of large, expanding bubbles in the interstellar medium caused by supernovae and other energy injection processes associated with massive star formation.
  7. Without access to information about the velocity perpendicular to our line of sight, there is an ambiguity about whether this flow goes up or down, but the expectation from the Parker instability is that it goes toward the galactic plane.
  8. G. Novak et al., Astrophys. J. 583, L83 (2003). [CrossRef]
  9. M. Morris, E. Serabyn, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 34, 645 (1996). [CrossRef]
  10. The footpoints are strongly tied to the gas in the galactic plane, and they will therefore follow that gas as it slowly migrates inward toward the galactic center by losing angular momentum through a variety of processes, one of which is the torque exerted by these magnetic columns that the gas is dragging along.
  11. F. Yusef-Zadeh, J. W. Hewitt, W. Cotton, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 155, 421 (2004). [CrossRef]
  12. I thank F. Coroniti for a thought-provoking discussion.

10.1126/science.1133500


The author is in the Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. E-mail: morris@astro.ucla.edu


The editors suggest the following Related Resources on Science sites:
In Science Magazine
REPORTS
Yasuo Fukui, Hiroaki Yamamoto, Motosuji Fujishita, Natsuko Kudo, Kazufumi Torii, Satoshi Nozawa, Kunio Takahashi, Ryoji Matsumoto, Mami Machida, Akiko Kawamura, Yoshinori Yonekura, Norikazu Mizuno, Toshikazu Onishi, and Akira Mizuno (6 October 2006)
Science 314 (5796), 106. [DOI: 10.1126/science.1130425]
   Abstract »    Full Text »    PDF »    Supporting Online Material »




ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products

ADVERTISEMENT

Featured Jobs